

September 15th Hardly a Deadline....Plus Pietrangelo News
Are we heading towards a lockout? This is the most commonly asked question nowadays amongst hockey fans as well as media trying to make a living covering the sport.
It’s safe to assume, barring an unforeseen circumstance, the owners will lockout the players once the current CBA expires September 15th. Neither side will likely put their best offer on the table until we either pass the “deadline” or the last few hours just before the league goes dark. I was once told bargaining is all about leverage and there is plenty of strategy that comes into play on both sides. Locking out the players is certainly a leverage point the owners are prepared to use to their advantage.
We can call September 15th a deadline all we want but I don’t get the sense the players or the owners are too concerned with this date. Neither side really loses any money until the regular season begins which is why there’s little concern about pushing this into October. Just like players won’t be happy with missing paychecks the owners have little interest in losing out on regular season revenue. They can live with skipping a few pre-season games.
To an extent it’s a game of cat and mouse only with hundreds of millions of dollars at stake. So far it’s been more like a UFC match and if winning the public relations war was the deciding factor the owners would already be tapping out.
I can’t remember a labor dispute that saw the owners be destroyed publicly as badly as they are today. It can’t be easy for Commissioner Gary Bettman and the league to accept but they’ve done little to help their cause. Whatever is being communicated to the fans needs to be presented in a cautious, positive, encouraging manner. This is an area the league has failed and it’s left the fans eager to side with the players. Until Bettman gives the fans even the tiniest sense of comfort, this won’t change anytime soon.
While Bettman has struggled when given the platform to speak publicly, NHLPA Executive Director Donald Fehr and his team have done a masterful job at presenting themselves as the victim. And many would argue that they are.
But in reality most of the players just want to play. For every player participating in negotiating sessions I can find another one who has little idea what’s going on. It’s just the reality of the situation. A limited percentage of players have a real grasp on where this is headed.
I’d love to sit here and say this is a battle of the players vs. owners but it wouldn’t be 100% accurate. Most on the inside view this as owners battling owners on how best to split revenues. Nearly every low-budget, mid-market owner would probably agree the league is under pressure to devise a better system themselves on how to distribute revenues. Whether it comes from increased revenue sharing or some type of taxation it’s up to the owners to find a common ground with one another.
The players won’t get off unscathed either. They won’t like hearing this but they’re going to have to give up additional revenue. Before some of you start screaming they already gave back in 2004, understand this won’t be resolved until they agree to come down less than 57% of hockey related revenue. This doesn’t mean it needs to be an even 50/50 split but they’re going to have to give back something. Whether it means the owners increase revenue sharing as a result remains to be seen. Many believe the owners would be willing to increase revenue sharing if the players agree to accept less than 57% of HRR.
The players are going to have eventually come down but it doesn’t have to happen today. Just know at some point it will.
Don’t get me wrong, all the other “core” issues are extremely important, but I can’t think of one that will prevent the season from starting on time. Each of these issues can be negotiated in a matter of days. Before a new CBA is agreed upon the owners must first decide what kind of system they want internally. Until this happens we’ll all be sitting on the outside looking in.
Blues Clues!
Sources confirm Blues star D-man Alex Pietrangelo has elected to have a “minor” procedure to clean up an ongoing lower body issue. The Blues tell me the surgery is “very minor “which suggests he should be 100% even if the season were to start on time.
More to come,
Andy Strickland
Strickland.andy@gmail.com
Rewind
Torres Catches Stoll
Watch
External Link
USA Draws Russia in World Championships QF
Russia beat USA in peliminary matchup6:00 AM Eastern Thursday
Rewind
Quick Flawless in Game 1 Win Over San Jose
Watch
Rewind
Malkin, Vokoun Carry Pens Over Sens
Watch

7 Comments | Share: Share Tweet
Lower Body...
Petro seems young to be getting a vasectomy.
Andy, your assumption is patently false. Most fans just want hockey, and have little interest in the financial minutiae of millionaires arguing with billionaires over $3 Billion in annual revenue:
http://www.cbc.ca/sports/hockey/nhl/story/2012/08/30/spf-nhl-nhlpa-vote-what-side-are-you-on.html
But the real story is who has the most to lose from a lockout. It's clearly the players. The average NHL player plays for 5.5 years and earns $2.5 million each of those years. In other words, his talent is a diminishing asset that on average is worth nothing after six years. It is the height of stupidity for NHL players to miss even one pay date during that small window of opportunity where they will most likely earn more than at any other time in their lives. Players can't stop Father Time from robbing them of their skills. Certainly there is some benefit for injured players to rest and rebuild their bodies but they would be far better off doing it under a new collective bargaining agreement where they would be paid as opposed to being locked out.
The owners on the other hand are in the driver's seat. Their asset (the teams) will continue to appreciate due to inflation and the growth of NHL hockey. They may suffer temporary losses due to disgruntled fans who are fed up with the collective bargaining gymnastics of the millionaires and billionaires, but eventually their asset will come back, because in the end, real hockey fans love the sport. Red Berenson and Barclay Plager no longer play for the team I started loving in 1967, but I still have season tickets to watch their successors, just as I will when Petro and Backs hang up their blades.
I am calling for a complete FAN lockout if this season loses any games. we barricade the doors and let no scabs in. see how the owners like their product with no attendance.
if you are in agreemance with me let me know here and i will send you my info so we can put this into action.
nhl.com has already barred me for this type of thought.
this is NOT 1984 we have rights and they can be heard
Scabs are normally temporary non-union workers who replace union workers during a labor dispute. flag this comment
it was a bad choice of a word. my intentions are true. if we lose any regular season games to this lockout, i want a fan strike. sitting outside with our jerseys on and signs protesting this type of b.s. we have already lost an entire season within this decade.
i support the blues and other teams around the league i just do not support the b.s.
8 days and counting.
However, speaking from experience, the NHL does not take fan disappointment seriously. During the last lockout, I was a part of a major fan site that actually managed to get the attention of hockey fans across the world. Bettmen and the NHL reps were as disinterested in the the fans voice as could be. Lou Lamoriello was the only guy that even reached out to show support for the fans at that time. Our goal was not to lock out the teams, we were trying to get people to go to games at the high school, college, or any level. Our call was to SUPPORT the game of hockey and to show the buying power of fans by utilizing the services of the NHL's biggest sponsors, get fans in the seats at lower level hockey arenas, and to wear NHL team colors despite the loss of the season. We wanted fans to be seen in public supporting the game. If we couldn't get the respect of the owners through this method, I just don't see how the hell you could get that same respect now, by trying to prevent fans from going to games! Just a thought!
flag this comment
if we are able to get 70 000 strong to protest nhl games for about 5-10 games i think the league would take notice.
i might be talking out of my ass, and being pissed about 3 work stoppages within 20 years, but i know there are other fans that think similar. flag this comment