October 28, 2011, 3:57 PM

Purchase Agreement Signed

Oct 28

Multiple sources confirm Chicago Businessman Matt Hulsizer today officially signed a purchase agreement to buy the St. Louis Blues. The rumor of a signed purchase agreement has been ongoing but I'm told the documents were finally signed today.

Several steps will still need to be made before the sale actually closes. This is just the second step of a multi-step process.

Word is the announced number is likely to come in slightly below the recent reported $185 million number.

I'll have more on this soon.

More to come,

Andy Strickland

strickland.andy@gmail.com

 

 

Andy Strickland is based out of St. Louis and has more than 10 years of experience covering the NHL. He is also a full time radio personality in St. Louis and can frequently be heard and seen throughout the United States and Canada on radio and television. He can be contacted via Twitter (@AndyStrickland) or on the Ask Andy page.

20 Comments | Share:

WOW!

It just makes you wonder what trades might be coming. I'm hoping we keep Schwartz and Tarasenko as it stands inless the return is overwhelming like Mike Richards.
in reply to BlueManGuru
To win the Cup this year we need first line play making center, a top flight goal tender, and a veteran d-man. Short of that, a trade is a waste regardless of ownership change. flag this comment
So Strickland scoops the Post-Dispatch. Surprised? Nope. Good job, Andy.
in reply to HallPlante
A Blues sale/Blues win/and Cards World Series victory all in the same day????? This could be a great day for St Louis sports fans.
in reply to carcus
Two out of three aint bad. flag this comment
You muthafuckas watching this hockey game?! It's a decent one...
in reply to Eggserino
How about someone score a fuckin' goal?! flag this comment
Yeah I saw Oshie blow his backcheck on the first goal we gave up letting the defensemen get position on him.

I'm tired of this team pulling the goaltender without position and lots of time on the clock. NOTE TO THE COACH DON'T PULL THE GOALIE BEFORE YOU CONTROL THE PUCK IN THEIR ZONE ON A DUMP IN. OTHERWISE YOUR TEAM IS GOING FORWARD WHILE PUCK IS COMING OUT THE OTHER WAY.

That said the Blues MUST win the battles on the side boards at the end of the game.

Team is tightening some things down so not a terrible loss.

Congrats to the Cardinals. It's nice to know we can win at something. flag this comment
Yeah they did tighten up the defensive coverage, and the few times they were lax the flames were able to capitalize. Still, the familiar script plays on. Poor special teams and our goalie gets outplayed by the opposition's. And WTF was that 5 on 3? everybody standing still passing the puck around the umbrella isn't going to do shit. Can we get a fuckin one timer?

And aside from that highlight reel goal, Stewie has been invisible for most of the young season. We need the Stewart from last year that was sniffing out pucks, the quiet areas, and pounding quality shots on goal. flag this comment
fatty. there was a lot of luck on the Calgary side. I counted five attempts at empty nets some how hitting someone or something and deflecting away from the goal every time.

The power play is looking a LOT better. There is better movement and they are getting people in the high slot. That said, why is Backes taking a shot at the short side on a 5-3 and not only doing it but MISSING the shot and creating a clear??? That was terrible decision making pure and simple. There was some decent movement on the 5-3 and I give Calgary credit for playing in a strong formation on the 5-3, they barely moved. While we had SOME movement we need to have more movement in front of the goal on a 5-3 or hell at anytime than what we saw.

Stewart looked terrible last night. I did not like his effort pure and simple. He dogged it. Hey if in his contract year he wants to play like a lazy turd it'll be on him.

Elliot was not bad last night. We just couldn't finish with all those creations, all those times getting Kippersof to be out of position. We weren't tough enough there.

A lot to like in the loss. Cola and Stewart had bad games last night and Oshie canNOT allow a defender to sneak into the back of a play like that and find himself a step behind the play.

flag this comment
What disappoints me though is this the third game I felt we should have managed to scrape a point out of. I felt there were too many times Calgary out worked us. But not as bad is in LA or Anaheim. We still worked pretty hard but a few moments here and there we were out worked and the bounces went against us.
Two players have got to get it going and that's Stewart and Oshie. Oshie has to play all 200 feet of the ice. There were three plays he didn't make. It's going to happen to be sure but the one that cost us the one that is concerning is on the first goal where he was a half step behind the creeping Kostopalotofsylables.
I really liked the first period especially on the road. We took the crowd out of the game. We out played them.
One other thing I noticed was that the point men were disappearing from their corners when so much of our game is working it along the boards and back the point and going to the net.
I don't think that style is the best. A lot of times the Calgary wingers sat at the half boards trying to cut the pass off and we still tried to force it. You should know that every team will pick that up on their video scouting and work on some break aways with that type of game. We give up up too much offense when we are always choosing to go into the corners instead of to the front of the net. The fourth line is the best at executing this part of the game b/c that's a fourth line style. It's not a bad default but we have to become creative and try and open up the ice in front of the net.

Yet this did happen a few times and in none of them were we able to take advantage of an nearly empty net. For whatever reason Kipper plays his best games against the Blues.
Calgary has some dangerous offensive weapons and a goaltender that can be nearly impossible to beat on some nights but they don't have that good of a defense. They are not a better team than the Blues. Too much forcing a dump in or forcing a play into their zone. We need to learn how to regroup if we don't find an opening and then try to come back in. If you rely on the dump against a goaltender who can play the puck that well then you'll have issues possessing the puck.
in reply to BlueManGuru
is this an article about last nights game or the PURCHASE AGREEMENT? (btw "fuck fuckity fuck fuck fuck" in my Cartman voice)
in reply to lopey10
This is an article about the purchase agreement. This is also a comment board about Blues hockey. Drunk, angry posting requires a couple of "fucks" up in the mix.

The purchase agreement article was posted in the afternoon. Much has happened since then. flag this comment
Dear Lone Wolf I guess you were wrong after all. No Quebec Blues, just Quebec blue balls. Maybe Phoenix...doubt it lol.
in reply to BlueManGuru
Dear bull shit NHL and fucking gay as Canadian officiating FUCK YOU! I will no longer support your second largest import of bull shit hockey. Call the fucking game by the same rules for both teams.

BULL SHIT. That's what the officiating has been and the worse I have seen all year. Ryan Smyth can take his hand off of his stick grab a guy's shoulder in the offensive zone then wrap his arm over his shoulder and pull him away from the puck cause a turn over then fucking score without a penalty. Then when players turn away from hits it is called boarding. Bull shit.

High sticks are optional to call against American teams also apparently. But remember you idiotic Canadians most of the players are Canadian on American teams. If you don't believe me watch the WJC when Canada plays AMerica and what happens when America takes a lead.

This is retarded. The Blues have talent that is NONEXISTENT as well. Create and score.

How about a goalie who makes some tough saves every once in a while as well. It would be nice. Tired of watching losses an inconsistent efforts and the most retarded officiating system in all of professional sports. Terrible. Edmonton is not that good.
in reply to BlueManGuru
I agree with you. It was like a college hockey game...lol (Eggs, this is a drunken post btw haha) flag this comment
I wrote this as the second period was winding down. The third was much better played by the Blues--there was creativity and Halak made a number of great saves. So if anything Halak is seeming to figure it out. But that officiating was terrible. In my anger the only reason I could figure it is that it was a Canadian team. But that's probably not it. How are we supposed to garner new fans or steal anyway from basketball when people have been watching the sport for thirty years cannot figure ou why one thing is called and not the other. The boarding call against Edmonton was a joke as well. If anything it looked like he stuck his butt end in what's his name's gut and if that's the case I'm thinking it's supposed to be a major but hey that's a hopeless wish. But the boarding calls on Oshie and Backes were some of the softest calls I have ever seen as well. When the other player turns away from a hit it's on them not the player making the hit.
I figured Edmonton was a lot better than what the writers were saying in the preseason but having said that they lack depth and are an injury or two away from having problems. Also their D played a lot better than they are. But when you can cross check players down to the ice when they have an empty net and not call it anybody can become a great defender, hey that's how Jackman made a name for himself in the clutch and grab days. flag this comment
I don't think this team is good enough to make the playoffs...
in reply to jammer21
The way they look right now, you're definitely right. If Stewart and Berglund are only going to show up once every few games, we need both Mcdonald and Perron in the line up to get some consistent pressure and maybe even score on a power play.

Defensively, Jackman needs to go. I could tolerate his lack of talent if he would at least make it difficult to stand in front of the net, but if he fails to even do that, what is he really bringing to the team? Petro and Shattenkirk aren't the most physical guys but at least they use their sticks to break up plays. The oilers have a bunch of no namers on D, yet they made it far more difficult to occupy the front of their net then the blues did. flag this comment
blues are just flat out bad. a 500 team at best. not even talent. unproven so-called stars that cannot produce on a consistent level. horrible special teams. how do you expect to win.
in reply to johnny

Have Your Say:

The Latest Truth

Rewind

Kings Launch Amazing Comeback

Watch

Could a Familiar Face Return to Dallas? Plus Horrible Call Impacts Sharks

Torres Hit As Bad As Past Incidents?

Rewind

Torres Catches Stoll

Watch

USA Draws Russia in World Championships QF

Russia beat USA in peliminary matchup
6:00 AM Eastern Thursday

Rewind

Quick Flawless in Game 1 Win Over San Jose

Watch

Rewind

Malkin, Vokoun Carry Pens Over Sens

Watch

Petro,Shatty Max Out on Bonus Money...Plus Do Blues Need a Change In Philosphy?

View More