March 17, 2011, 10:37 AM

NHL Already Involved in Blues Situation?

Mar 17

Now what for the St. Louis Blues?

The news of the Blues being for sale has left many fans wondering if their days are numbered in St. Louis.

Take a deep breath, the Blues aren’t going anywhere.

One thing we do know about Commissioner Gary Bettman is that he isn’t interested in re-locating traditional franchises. That includes the St. Louis Blues who broke into the NHL back in 1967. Bettman fully understands the history and tradition of the Blues and he’s not about to let someone swoop in and relocate the team to Winnipeg.

One other thing I can tell you about Bettman is that he and the league are very much involved in the situation involving Blues ownership. In fact sources confirm the $110 million offer made by Tom Stillman was delivered directly to the NHL and Bettman, not to Dave Checketts or TowerBrook Capital.

To what level the NHL is involved remains somewhat unclear. It’s safe to assume the longer this goes on the greater the involvement will become.

The NHL has very broad powers and they can certainly control how much a team is sold for and when the team is sold. The situation in Phoenix confirms the idea that the NHL has the wherewithal to allow this to last for several months even if that takes us into free agency.


How much are the Blues worth?

Just because the Buffalo Sabres sold for $189 million doesn’t necessarily mean the Blues hold the same value. What about the Tampa Bay Lightning that recently sold for less than $100 million?  That transaction also included a good chunk of land that surrounds the stadium the Lightning play in.

At the end of the day any franchise is worth whatever price someone is willing to pay. The NHL didn’t just dismiss the offer made by minority Owner Tom Stillman and his group. Sources confirm the NHL told the group the offer isn’t good enough “right now”.

Could that change down the road?

Possibly, obviously if someone comes along and offers $130 or $140 million then the $110 million offer already made is no longer credible.

For several years I’ve heard from local individuals complaining about what’s wrong with the Blues and how they would fix things. This includes people with heavy pockets who could make a run for the franchise.

Memo to all the big boys….Here’s your chance to put your money where your mouth is. Now’s the time to step up.


The NHL needs to be careful in terms of how much they value the St. Louis Blues to be worth. Someone may be able to purchase the team at $190 million but can they afford to fund the losses for years down the road?

If your offer is $110 and you have a capable capital structure in place that allows you to sign free agents, isn’t that better than a group that overpays and finds itself forced to sell a few years down the line?

I have no idea if Stillman will pull this off but nobody should be so quick to dismiss a local group looking to run this franchise. This group would have the ability to generate far more local corporate support than any outsider who comes in. What good is St. Louis without its professional sports teams? Who wants to see St. Louis turn into Tulsa?

It’s the obligation of local corporations to support businesses such as local professional sports teams.

I’ve already reported Stillman’s group includes Cardinals President Bill Dewitt III. This partnership would allow both franchises to cross promote as well as bringing an individual on board with some background on running a pro sports team.  Would Dewitt III be involved on a day to day basis? Not likely but he would certainly be a resource for the group.

I give credit to Checketts and SCP for doing their best but at the end of the day private equity companies aren’t known for running sports franchises. Sure TowerBrook Capital owns around 70% of the Blues but the transaction was heavily financed as they borrowed at least $100 million. The actual sale price was in the $132 Million range, less than the $150 number that’s been tossed around.   

One criteria for owning a sports franchise is having cash flow. Stillman and company believe they have enough to make it work. There are names involved in this group that will remain quiet for now but I wouldn’t recommend suggesting this group doesn’t have the capital structure to make it work. Just because they made a low offer doesn’t mean this is all they can afford. All it really says is this is what they believe the Blues are worth.

Is the organization distressed? Sure but still not to the point where the league is forced to accept their low offer today. Time will tell if that changes.

The idea the Blues just went on the market yesterday is incorrect. Sources say this franchise has been for sale for quite some time.


More to come,
Andy Strickland
Strickland.andy@gmail.com

Andy Strickland is based out of St. Louis and has more than 10 years of experience covering the NHL. He is also a full time radio personality in St. Louis and can frequently be heard and seen throughout the United States and Canada on radio and television. He can be contacted via Twitter (@AndyStrickland) or on the Ask Andy page.

20 Comments | Share:

"...the Blues arent going anywhere."


Truer words have never been spoken.....

in reply to bcallaway
Hey! Tulsa Oilers ftw, thank you very much! Oh right, the Tulsa Oilers aren't very good, God love 'em.
in reply to STLblue
Please keep Bettman as far from StL as possible.
in reply to Eggserino
Ditto.

Somebody needs to put him in a house, on a farm, in Kansas, w/ a little dog, & in path of a very, very large tornado . . . flag this comment
hey guru if you're out there.. i was in a Winner's (not owned by charles sheen) the other day and saw a nice pleather jacket on sale that was actually branded "blue man guru".. i wanted to grab a photo but i don't own a camera..
in reply to Blue Clam
I don't even know why that would be real. That would be awesome. flag this comment
has checkett's really done everything he can to try and find a backer? i haven't seen him on dragon's den yet (or i think the american version is shark tank?)
in reply to Blue Clam
Not knowing the strength of the league, I have a workable situation that may not be popular with the other owners who just acquired teams.
Regardless of the structure of a new ownership group, if having new ownership in St Louis is a goal of the NHL, they should underwrite the transaction. If $100MM has been offered, the new owners should sign a Note for another $25MM-$35MM payable over 5-10 years @ 7% interest, guaranteed by the league if the new owners default.

This will maintain some level of cash for offseason acquisitions and allow the team to grow their success, making the payment on the note minor. The current owners will get the amount they desire (saving their investment) and still make a few bucks along the way (they are a capital company after all).

I’m available to do the negotiations.

I’m just sayin’
in reply to ChicagoBob
The St. Louis metro area has approximately 2,000,000 more people than the Tulsa metro area. While Tulsa is a year or two from hitting the 1,000,000 mark, St. Louis is a year or two from hitting the 3,000,000 mark. This might also contribute to the differences between the two cities (rather than just professional sports teams).
in reply to Drew
Hey, Tulsa's got a WNBA team too! I think. I've never been. But I'm sure both of their fans think it's great. flag this comment
This could be a blessing in disguise for the Blues. This team would be better off with local ownership and if they can get in with a reasonable offer, they wont have to operate on the shoestring budget that we've have with Dave Chcketts, who lets be clear, isn't much more than a glorified hedge fund manager with PR skills.

I just hope that they do retain the current management team, who in my opinion has rebuilt this team to the point where all they need is some extra salary to become a contender.
in reply to fattyboubatty
Nicely said Fatty. flag this comment
All I can say is I am not worried.

I would like it better if say there was a twenty-five percent ownership/shares offered to fans and season ticket holders. Our pool of money could help purchase the team and contracts can be made for private shares like that where you have to stay invested for a period of time etc. and buying prices. But I think the future for sports teams will be some form of fan ownership, especially quiet ownership.
in reply to BlueManGuru
The Green Bay Packer model works with the Packers because they're in the NFL and reap the national television revenue. NFL teams are in the black before the season even starts.

This model just doesn't work in the NHL.

The only model that will work for the Blues is the Red Wing model. Someone with extremely deep pockets who's willing to put his own money into a very long term committment and lose and lose until you become a perennial three and four round playoff team three out of every four years.

The Red Wings were a colossal failure for years before getting the formula right. Once you get it right, you need good hockey people to keep it working. the Blues have always been blessed with solid hockey minds in the FO.

Fan-shares and investment groups do not work. They are all too impatient and look to dump out in five years. flag this comment
bcal, I'd argue that's the only model that works consistently in hockey. flag this comment
Well again I said the investment should be defined. First it's a quiet investment; Second you cannot cash out for so many years. Other than than that most people would pay a hundred or more for a share of the Blues. I know I wold the depth this team is starting to have is too thick to believe they'll be held down for long. Even if they fail, you miss out on a dividend but you still even more a part of your team. It's a win-win. As long as parameters are properly drawn up concerning the investment.

BTW the Blues can save electirical costs on the building by installing new green toilets that generate electricity from piss. It's a pissy idea but yet another win-win. flag this comment
I'm so sick of saying " geez... I cant wait till next year "... but im afraid that next year might be the year... ownership or not. We got rid of some dead weight and obtained some fine talent in return... some draft picks as well. Perron will be back, more than likely the Russian Tank will be up with the big boys. If the Blues dont make it past the second round of the playoffs next year, I will be very surprised. Go Blues!
in reply to Nathan Browne
I would also only weak links left are Crombeen, Jackman, Janssen and consistent goaltending. But maybe next year with depth this team won't break apart the way it did this year when injuries hit because of the lack of depth.

I'd rather have a young defense than a bunch of guys who can barely play at the speed of the game.

As it is you have to assume McDOnald and Oshie will miss games at some point. Err, also I forgot about Cola who is a risk out there five on five. And hopefully are coach has learned some new things out there. flag this comment
we also have kariya and brewer coming back from injury next season. that's pretty much like signing 2 high profile players over the summer flag this comment
@BlueClam

That is some dark, dark, sadistic humor you've got there my friend! flag this comment

Have Your Say:

The Latest Truth

Top Stories From the World Championships

Is USA a Gold medal contender?
Elimination round starting up

Beefy?

Sources say recent talk of Vladimir Tarasenko bulking up for the NHL are untrue  Read more

Rewind

John Tortorella Post-Game

Watch

Rewind

Rangers Take Game 1

Watch

Details of Hull's Role With Blues Getting Clearer

An agreement between Hull and Stillman could come by the end of the week  Read more

Stillman Perseveres

Today was more of a celebration than a press conference  Read more

New Era

Tom Stillman has landed an impressive group of local investors as he begins a new era of Blues ownership  Read more

All eyes on Barret Jackman

Is it in Jackman's best interest to move on?  Read more

View More