January 23, 2011, 9:06 AM

McDonald to Start Practicing?

Jan 23

The good news is Blues forward Andy McDonald is skating, the even better news is that McDonald is expected to make the two game road trip beginning Monday night in Colorado.

Obviously McDonald, who began skating this week as he makes his way back from a concussion, will not be playing on the trip but there’s a very strong chance he begins practicing with his teammates for the first time since being hurt.

It’s been a long road for McDonald who’s needed several weeks to kick the symptoms (headaches) that have kept him off the ice. On more than one occasion he was cleared to begin riding the bike but the exercise would induce headaches, a clear sign he wasn’t ready to return.

After seeing multiple Doctors, most if not all believed to be in St. Louis, the guy they call Mac Daddy is getting closer by the day. It goes without saying the Blues could use his speed both on the power play and during even strength. When healthy, McDonald is obviously one of the top few players on the team and gives the team more creativity and scoring potential. His ability to carry the puck and play in the offensive end makes him a threat just about every time he hops over the boards.  More than being just a good hockey player, McDonald brings winning experience as the only player on the roster with a Stanley Cup ring. If the Blues had stayed healthy all season long you could make the case they’d potentially have eight to ten more points than they have right now.

Besides getting back in game shape McDonald has had to work to pack on some pounds as he lost some weight during his time away from the rink.

 

What happened on Saturday night?

Saturday’s loss wasn’t about injuries. There’s really no excuse for the performance we saw in front of a packed house against Columbus. In fact Head Coach Davis Payne went as far as to call it “inexcusable”.
The Blues went at least half the second period without registering a shot on goal. This came against Blue Jackets goaltender Steve Mason who looked scared to death to start the game. The Blues gave Mason plenty of time to settle back in as I could play goal in the NHL if I knew I wouldn’t be facing any shots.

 

McRae needs time….

The Blues need help offensively. I like Phillip McRae and believe he has a chance to be a good NHL player one day but the team didn’t draft him to come up here and play 6:25.   The fact that he’s seeing such little ice is a sign that he’s probably not yet ready to play the role they need from him. The Blues drafted Mcrae in the second round because they believe he has offensive upside at the NHL level. I’m a firm believer that if you’re going to call up a scorer, you use him as a scorer. The problem is his game isn’t seasoned enough to play the role they hope he can play in the years to come. This is far from a knock on McRae who still needs some time to get stronger and develop the body necessary to play at this level. I’d much rather see McRae up here when’s he ready to contribute offense. He was a minus-2 on the night.    
 
 

Pietrangelo Shines With EJ?

Remember when the Blues drafted Alex Pietrangelo and John Davidson would often say how nice it will be to see Pietrangelo and Erik Johnson playing the point together for the next ten years? They looked pretty comfortable to me on Saturday.

Pietrangelo was as involved as we’ve see in a number of games playing over 26 minutes and leading the way with four shots on goal. He was skating and at times was the best player on the ice. You could see a difference with Johnson as well whose confidence is growing by the game. There was a defensive coverage issue on CBJ’s first goal in which Johnson was caught up ice but got back in plenty of time to re-gain defensive position. Instead T.J. Oshie was stuck down low and lost body position to Antoine Vermette who had an easy tap in for the Jackets first goal.

I thought the line of Steen, Backes and Boyes had plenty of chances for St. Louis but they just couldn’t finish. They had a lot of zone time but looked a little off when it came to capitalizing on the chances they generated. Give credit to Columbus who did a good job of getting sticks in lanes especially down low. The Blues had trouble handling their backside pressure much of the evening. 

The Blues had a chance to put together a really nice three game home stand. Instead they left some valuable points on the table. A third period Backes penalty which erased a Blues power play didn’t help. The Blues All-Star was caught in no-man’s land along the blue line and couldn’t get out of the way of a Columbus player. Backes’ was trying to stay onsides while his eyes were on T.J. Oshie who was carrying the puck across the line.

Where’s Cam Janssen?

I’d much rather have Janssen fighting Jared Boll than B.J. Crombeen. Ryan reaves gave the Blues a few good games but has since gone quiet.

 

The Blues will take Stefan Della Rovere and D-man Nikita Nikitin on the upcoming trip while ryan Reaves and Ian Cole have been sent back to Peoria.

 

More to come,
Andy Strickland
strickland.andy@gmail.com
 

Andy Strickland is based out of St. Louis and has more than 10 years of experience covering the NHL. He is also a full time radio personality in St. Louis and can frequently be heard and seen throughout the United States and Canada on radio and television. He can be contacted via Twitter (@AndyStrickland) or on the Ask Andy page.

26 Comments | Share:

I'd like to think Janssen's days are numbered in STL. Don't get me wrong Andy, he has shown every sign of being a plus teamate & civic minded member of this hockey club; a consummate professional.

However, Ryan Reaves has shown he can fill Janssens niche & excel. From the sample we've seen this last week & a half, Reaves has shown he has better hockey sense, anticipation, vision, great tempo, greater size, & better skill w/ the puck.

Janssen's proved to be a great personality. But Reaves is the better 4th line player.
in reply to BlueNoteCode
Can't argue with any of that! Janssen should enjoy St Louis while it lasts. flag this comment
Reaves is better 4th line player.But Jansen is a much better fighter and he will fight any heavyweight in the Leaque.Jansen also knows when the Blues needs a spark and he gets something going with a big hit or a fight.Reaves still needs to learn that, but I would still keep Jansen on the team because certain teams he is better playing against and other teams Reaves would be better playing against.IMHO ,Keep them both ,Like when we had both DJ King and Jansen .Injurys as we know happen, so lets keep them both.McRae experience here should help him immencely but he needs to play in Peoria.He will be good with more muscle and playing experience.
in reply to oldbattler@sbcglobal.net
RUDY!! RUDY!! RUDY!!

That's all that comes to mind when I think of Janssen. Guy will go and fight anybody...I give him full marks for that. However, the guy is nothing more than a novelty. Honestly folks, I hate when people talk about a fight firing a team up. Any fight will fire both teams up and that high lasts about :30 before both teams settle back into their game plan. IMO, dressing Janssen to play < 5min per game is a waste of a 4th liner who could be out there forechecking the crap out of the other team all the while possessing something that resembles hockey sense. Reaves looked good up here....should have kept him around. flag this comment
Reaves is better 4th line player.But Jansen is a much better fighter and he will fight any heavyweight in the Leaque.Jansen also knows when the Blues needs a spark and he gets something going with a big hit or a fight.Reaves still needs to learn that, but I would still keep Jansen on the team because certain teams he is better playing against and other teams Reaves would be better playing against.IMHO ,Keep them both ,Like when we had both DJ King and Jansen .Injurys as we know happen, so lets keep them both.McRae experience here should help him immencely but he needs to play in Peoria.He will be good with more muscle and playing experience.
in reply to oldbattler@sbcglobal.net
I hope the Blues play better against the Avalanche this year then they did last year.They owned the Blues last year.Plus they got what should have been, our number 1 center from our own backyard Paul Stastny.Kerlalainen made big draft mistake by passing on him.But hopefully Andy McDonald comes back soon and stays healthy and he gives the Blues help with his speed and skills,we need more goal scoring !
in reply to oldbattler@sbcglobal.net
When you lose Saturday night home games to the Columbus Blue Jackets, you are not a playoff team. Look, we've missed our three best forwards for most of the season. I get that. And we did a halfway decent job hanging in the West. But we're relatively healthy right now. A lot of other teams are without key players, too. I've been watching pretty lifeless efforts since about mid-December. Really, only two periods of solid hockey most nights. Remember how Payne was hard on the Blues during their winning streak in December? It's because if they continued to play that way (and they have) they'd leave points on the table. A playoff team does not let the lowly Columbus Blue Jackets walk all over them on home ice in front of a sellout crowd. We've got a solid top 4 defense even with injuries, healthy goaltending, and a relatively healthy forward core now that Oshie's back. As it stands - even without Perron and McDonald - the Blues should be above .500 from here on out.
in reply to jammer21
I agree. Apparently signing Boyes to $4 million a season was a mistake. Always has to be a reason a talented player is passed around from team to team without much of a chance.

Other teams also win despite injuries because they have depth at scoring. flag this comment
The only thing I could think about watching that game Saturday night was, "WTF...WTF...WTF...WTF!!!" That game was the low point for me as a Blues fan this season...I was (and am) embarrassed to be a fan after that listless effort. They came out of the gates blazing and then just turned it off and barely even skated around out there. Where in the hell was David Backes and TJ Oshie all game? I'm glad Payne addressed this loss and labeled it as "inexcusable" b/c that is what it was. It was the freakin' Columbus Blue Jackets for Christ-sake!!! That game just left an acid taste in my mouth....horrible effort...just horrible. flag this comment
the reason why McRae isnt getting much playing time is he is on the 4th line with Reaves and Crombeen. Put him on a line with offensive players not fighters. Good news on McDonald.
in reply to stlblues1
Agree. This has been a problem on this coaching staff since day one this season; An over-reliance on role players much the way Murray made the mistake on who gets ice time. You need goals to win is the bottom line. Maybe you change it up in the play offs depending upon who you play. Even Payne believes in time of possession and being in the offensive zone but the likes of McClement, Crombeen and Winchester aren't going to produce you very much as results go. Add McRae to the third line, or for that matter any offensive player brought up to St. Louis. Expecting them to produce on the fourth line is like trying to squeeze blood from a stone. Look at how Steen struggled scoring earlier in the season when he was on a line with McClement and Crombeen.

It's senseless. At this point the team might as well lose out and get a top five draft pick. flag this comment
Yeah tanking the season for a high pick in a weak draft is what we should do. Gimme a brake, dude. flag this comment
Well zezel duke I'll give you a break. Consider the last weak draft produced Patrick Kane, Perron, Cole and others. Weak is a comparison adjective. Weak can mean lot of things and it all depends on what some scouts consider weak in general terms concerning a draft class.

But mainly I'm being sarcastic here. If the Blues management won't make a deal for a player then this team has little chance of making the play offs or doing much in them. If their pick is higher because they have some compete in it what do you get? Now if they make the play offs and suck well at least players' get the experience but if not you might as well fail miserably and pick up a better asset. There are some real good players in this draft. Weak means that maybe the top fifteen or so picks are looking like they're full of number goaltenders, first line players, first paring defensemen. But second and third line players are also important. I think of Patrick Sharp as a second liner and he's one of the best second liners in the league. flag this comment
Well said but if you look at that years draft even in hindsight it's still weak. Not many decent players, just a handful. Then again it's no '99. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_NHL_Entry_Draft flag this comment
Where's Cam Janssen? Right where he belongs.

in reply to bcallaway
Guru, to continue my thought from last week that I wanted to run past you.....

You talked about it a little bit in your post. I posted this a couple of weeks ago in the Stltoday forum as well, it has to do with how the military deals with blasts and should the NHL look at a similar policy.

I was watching a Sunday morning news talkie a few weeks back that had a military commander on it. He said that when soldiers are involved in a blast, esecially if they are inside a structure, they are immediately taken out of service and observed for 24 hours.

He said the most important time period they deal with is to get the soldier out of service and in a rest environment and get his heart rate down before nightfall.

Made we wonder if NHL teams should adopt a policy that if a player takes a head shot that leads to him losing conciousness or is disoriented and woozy, that he comes out of the game immediately and does not return and is allowed to be observed for the next 24-48 hours.

May not have a positive affect in every case, but you cannot tell me that its good for a player that gets jacked and is allowed to remain in a game and keeps his cardio and heart rate pumping at high speeds.

Low and behold - on HNIC Saturday, one of the panelists on Hot Stove mentioned that JD is interested in exploring a rule stating if a player loses conciousness in a game, he has to come out.

I wanted to bounce it off a military guy that has seen live action.
in reply to bcallaway
Well man it's tough to say. It's really a complicated issue. What has occurred in the military is a quick turn around in policy from when I first went overseas to how the treatment has evolved since. We find out that often TBI's do not even show up in a 48 hr window but sometimes it takes months to observe. A strong consideration has to be the pyschological make up of the individual and if there are any indications that their behavior has changed. One thing to look for is someone that becomes easily frustrated and angry at inappropriate times. Short term memory loss and spacial memory issues are cognitive factors that should send warning signals to staff.
Probably the best thing would be to use a functioning mri first at the beginings of the season as a true baseline. These memory tests and other cognitive tests used as baselines are not as accurate of indicators as a functional mri would be in these cases. Furthermore, it would allow the doctors to understand the severity of such cases and then prescribe a more appropriate schedule for therapy and healing.
But never forget the Rocket gets conked out. He's obviously concussed. He goes back on the ice in the same game and scores the winner and still doesn't know where he is. But what price did he pay for it later in life? It has far more implications on the individual than simply cognitive factors like becoming as messed as Ali.
It's for the individual possibly to decide. But certainly more people are concussed in the game of hockey than people would like to know. You do not have to lose consciousness to have a tbi. Dealing with blast waves can be far different from the brain bruising itself inside the skull and similar in some cases. Better helmets and mandatory face shields will go a long way. Actually having rules that punish players even after games for leaving their feet or even the attempt to do so would help. Taking players out the game with obvious concussions should be a no brainer. Perron should not have come back out that game. Thorton should have been suspended longer as the news of Perron's injury became clearer. But money and stars that bring it in being what it is has made the NHL appear to care on the one hand and turn a blind eye on the other. flag this comment
Well man it's tough to say. It's really a complicated issue. What has occurred in the military is a quick turn around in policy from when I first went overseas to how the treatment has evolved since. We find out that often TBI's do not even show up in a 48 hr window but sometimes it takes months to observe. A strong consideration has to be the pyschological make up of the individual and if there are any indications that their behavior has changed. One thing to look for is someone that becomes easily frustrated and angry at inappropriate times. Short term memory loss and spacial memory issues are cognitive factors that should send warning signals to staff.
Probably the best thing would be to use a functioning mri first at the beginings of the season as a true baseline. These memory tests and other cognitive tests used as baselines are not as accurate of indicators as a functional mri would be in these cases. Furthermore, it would allow the doctors to understand the severity of such cases and then prescribe a more appropriate schedule for therapy and healing.
But never forget the Rocket gets conked out. He's obviously concussed. He goes back on the ice in the same game and scores the winner and still doesn't know where he is. But what price did he pay for it later in life? It has far more implications on the individual than simply cognitive factors like becoming as messed as Ali.
It's for the individual possibly to decide. But certainly more people are concussed in the game of hockey than people would like to know. You do not have to lose consciousness to have a tbi. Dealing with blast waves can be far different from the brain bruising itself inside the skull and similar in some cases. Better helmets and mandatory face shields will go a long way. Actually having rules that punish players even after games for leaving their feet or even the attempt to do so would help. Taking players out the game with obvious concussions should be a no brainer. Perron should not have come back out that game. Thorton should have been suspended longer as the news of Perron's injury became clearer. But money and stars that bring it in being what it is has made the NHL appear to care on the one hand and turn a blind eye on the other. flag this comment
Well man it's tough to say. It's really a complicated issue. What has occurred in the military is a quick turn around in policy from when I first went overseas to how the treatment has evolved since. We find out that often TBI's do not even show up in a 48 hr window but sometimes it takes months to observe. A strong consideration has to be the pyschological make up of the individual and if there are any indications that their behavior has changed. One thing to look for is someone that becomes easily frustrated and angry at inappropriate times. Short term memory loss and spacial memory issues are cognitive factors that should send warning signals to staff.
Probably the best thing would be to use a functioning mri first at the beginings of the season as a true baseline. These memory tests and other cognitive tests used as baselines are not as accurate of indicators as a functional mri would be in these cases. Furthermore, it would allow the doctors to understand the severity of such cases and then prescribe a more appropriate schedule for therapy and healing.
But never forget the Rocket gets conked out. He's obviously concussed. He goes back on the ice in the same game and scores the winner and still doesn't know where he is. But what price did he pay for it later in life? It has far more implications on the individual than simply cognitive factors like becoming as messed as Ali.
It's for the individual possibly to decide. But certainly more people are concussed in the game of hockey than people would like to know. You do not have to lose consciousness to have a tbi. Dealing with blast waves can be far different from the brain bruising itself inside the skull and similar in some cases. Better helmets and mandatory face shields will go a long way. Actually having rules that punish players even after games for leaving their feet or even the attempt to do so would help. Taking players out the game with obvious concussions should be a no brainer. Perron should not have come back out that game. Thorton should have been suspended longer as the news of Perron's injury became clearer. But money and stars that bring it in being what it is has made the NHL appear to care on the one hand and turn a blind eye on the other. flag this comment
Thank you Guru. flag this comment
The blues are the easiest team to own on the blue line. there is always 2-3 people standing on the blue line waiting on the puck. Meanwhile all 5 players of the other team are looking at the puckhandler and saying "I dare you to try to cross that line.

We look like the mighty ducks when their Flying V got crushed by the russians.

"Lets go shake dare hanz"
in reply to bobwehadababyitsaboy
Sorry Bob, I love the line!! But it was team Iceland and yes they do look like the Flying V. In fact, I am really hoping Eric Johnson will work on a knuckle puck. flag this comment
Sorry Bob, I love the line!! But it was team Iceland and yes they do look like the Flying V. In fact, I am really hoping Eric Johnson will work on a knuckle puck. flag this comment
This team is a bottom third team let's face it. They're special teams are horrible. Didn't Doug armstrong say, hey were going to be team that is tight checking, play low scoring games and rely on our goaltending and special teams.... None of that has happened. Secondly, name one team since the lockout that won the cup that was low scoring.....in fact no team in the top ten in power rankings is low scoring... It sounds like a marketing firm that happens to be in professional sports....
in reply to Ryan Meier
Wow...another great 15 minutes of hockey out of this team. WTF is going on with these bums? I know we're above .500 and all, but I'm starting to question whether or not Davis Payne is the right guy for the job. If he cannot instill a healthy work ethic in these guys then he's gotta go. This is 2 games in a row that they've failed to even come CLOSE to playing a full game....this even after the previous game in which Payne labeled as "inexcusable". So instead of rolling into Colorado all fired up, they mail in yet another so-so effort. I'm ready to puke....I've actually all ready thrown up in my mouth a little watching that game last night. Pathetic....simply pathetic. The only people who showed up last night was McClement's line, Petro, and Brewer.
in reply to NortheastBlue15
....also, Eklund is reporting that the Blues are exploring the possibility of trading EJ. Some think it might could be straight up for Semin.

I'm not in the camp of "trade EJ, like...YESTERDAY" as some people have grown to be, but let's be honest here. With each passing sub-par performance, his expiration light in STL is blinking brighter with every passing game. He needs to figure out a way to become more solid all around. EJ is still trying to do too much with the puck, trying to fight through 1-2 board battles, and he's not getting clean shots through to the net (actually he's fanning on a lot of shots). Personally, I do think a lot of his woes can be directly tied to Petro's success. I think envy does play in a bit here that Petro can step in and dominate where-as EJ is still finding his footing. I think b/c of this EJ is trying to push his game and make something happen instead of letting the game come to him. He shows flashes of greatness when he can let the game come to him and do what's natural. I think we all know that Petro is going to be a better offensive defenseman, but EJ has the ability to not only put points on the board...but he can be a dominant defenseman if he just settles down AND learns to play the body more and use his 6'4" frame to his advantage....play with an edge....a mean-streak even.
in reply to NortheastBlue15

Have Your Say:

The Latest Truth

Top Stories From the World Championships

Is USA a Gold medal contender?
Elimination round starting up

Beefy?

Sources say recent talk of Vladimir Tarasenko bulking up for the NHL are untrue  Read more

Rewind

John Tortorella Post-Game

Watch

Rewind

Rangers Take Game 1

Watch

Details of Hull's Role With Blues Getting Clearer

An agreement between Hull and Stillman could come by the end of the week  Read more

Stillman Perseveres

Today was more of a celebration than a press conference  Read more

New Era

Tom Stillman has landed an impressive group of local investors as he begins a new era of Blues ownership  Read more

All eyes on Barret Jackman

Is it in Jackman's best interest to move on?  Read more

View More